AceTheRound
Interview questionPrivate EquityAssociateTechnicalIntermediate

How to Answer “What characteristics make a company a good LBO candidate?” in Private Equity Interviews

“What characteristics make a company a good LBO candidate?” is a core prompt in private equity technical questions, because it shows whether you understand how leverage creates equity returns—and what can break the model. A strong answer is not a list; it’s a clear set of good LBO candidate characteristics tied to the LBO value creation levers.

In interviews, treat this as LBO interview prep for real deal screening: you’re explaining what makes debt repayable, downside manageable, and upside achievable, using practical criteria you’d apply in a first-pass investment memo.

What PE Interviewers Look For in This LBO Screening Question

Interviewers use this question to test whether you can translate LBO mechanics into business judgement. They’re looking for you to connect cash flow stability, leverage capacity, and multiple/margin assumptions to the investor’s return profile, rather than reciting generic “stable company” language.

They’re also assessing whether you can prioritise and trade off criteria. Many businesses have one or two “good” traits but fail on a deal-breaker (e.g., cyclicality, customer concentration, capex burden, or covenant risk). A good associate-level answer flags what matters most for debt paydown and resilience through a downside case.

Finally, this is a communication test common in private equity interview questions: can you stay structured, use the right terminology (FCF, covenants, working capital, exit multiple), and show you’d be credible in a screening discussion with an investment committee?

Good LBO Candidate Characteristics: A Clear Answer Framework

  1. 1

    Step 1: Start with the LBO objective (returns driven by debt paydown + exit)

    Open by anchoring on what an LBO is trying to achieve: amplify equity returns through leverage, then repay that leverage with the company’s free cash flow and/or value creation. This sets up the criteria logically—good candidates are those where debt is serviceable under conservative assumptions and equity value can grow through operational improvements, multiple expansion (sometimes), or de-risking.

    Keep it associate-level: mention that the “right” candidate depends on the sponsor’s strategy (control buyout vs. carve-out vs. platform + add-ons), but the baseline screening lens is consistent—predictable cash generation, defensible downside, and clear paths to value creation without relying solely on financial engineering.

    This framing also signals you understand why “good” is relative: a slower-growth, stable business might support higher leverage (lower risk), while a faster-growth business might be viable with lower leverage but strong equity upside.

  2. 2

    Step 2: Lay out the core LBO candidate traits (cash flow, resilience, and leverage capacity)

    Give a structured set of LBO candidate traits that directly map to debt capacity and default risk. Start with strong, stable, and visible free cash flow: recurring or contracted revenue, diversified customers, rational pricing dynamics, and low volatility in demand. Then highlight healthy margins and cash conversion—limited working-capital swings, manageable capex, and no hidden cash drains (e.g., pension deficits, litigation, aggressive revenue recognition).

    Next, address resilience: defensible market position, sticky customers, and a product/service that holds up in a downturn. Mention that sponsors care about a credible downside case where the business remains covenant-compliant.

    Finally, connect to leverage capacity: moderate existing leverage, asset backing (where relevant), and financing availability. The key is not “maximum leverage,” but sustainable leverage with headroom.

  3. 3

    Step 3: Identify value-creation levers beyond leverage (operations, strategy, and exit)

    After establishing debt paydown, describe what improves equity value. Interviewers want to hear practical levers a sponsor can control: cost take-out, procurement and pricing, salesforce effectiveness, SKU rationalisation, footprint optimisation, working-capital initiatives, and disciplined capex.

    Add strategy levers that commonly show up in buyouts: buy-and-build (add-ons with synergy capture), professionalisation of management, product expansion, and geographic/channel expansion—while emphasising execution risk and integration costs.

    Then speak to the exit: clear buyer universe (strategics and sponsors), a business model that can command a stable exit multiple, and an equity story that strengthens over the hold period (e.g., improved margins, reduced customer concentration, cleaner reporting). This is where financial modeling interview prep matters: you’re implicitly explaining what will drive the exit EBITDA and multiple in the model.

  4. 4

    Step 4: Call out common red flags and how you’d pressure-test them

    Demonstrate judgement by naming a few deal-breakers and how you’d test them with financial analysis. Red flags include high cyclicality with operating leverage, heavy and inflexible maintenance capex, volatile working capital, high customer concentration, rapid tech disruption, or regulatory/commodity exposure that makes cash flows hard to forecast.

    Explain quick pressure tests you’d run in an LBO context: downside revenue and margin cases, working-capital stress, capex step-ups, and interest rate sensitivity. Mention covenant headroom and liquidity runway (cash + revolver) as practical constraints.

    Close the step by noting that a “good” candidate is one where returns are robust across scenarios—i.e., you can still delever and protect equity value without heroic assumptions.

Model Answer for Private Equity Technical Questions (Associate)

Model answer

A good LBO candidate is a business where leverage is safely serviceable and equity value can grow through controllable improvements. In practice, I look for predictable free cash flow so the company can pay down debt, plus clear levers to create value over a 3–5 year hold.

On the cash-flow side, the best candidates have recurring or resilient revenue, strong margins, and good cash conversion—limited working-capital volatility and manageable maintenance capex. That stability matters because the LBO return profile depends heavily on steady debt amortisation, and you need a downside case where the business stays covenant-compliant.

I also look at leverage capacity and balance sheet flexibility: reasonable starting leverage, access to financing, and headroom against shocks like rate increases or a temporary earnings decline.

Then I focus on value creation beyond leverage: operational initiatives like pricing, procurement, and cost take-out; commercial improvements; and sometimes buy-and-build if the industry is fragmented and integration risk is manageable. Finally, I sanity-check the exit—there should be a credible buyer universe and an exit multiple that isn’t purely dependent on market expansion.

Red flags would be highly cyclical demand, heavy ongoing capex, big customer concentration, or exposures that make cash flows hard to forecast. In an interview, I’d summarise it as: stable FCF for deleveraging, resilient downside, and a realistic plan to improve EBITDA and the equity story.

  • Anchor on the LBO mechanics: debt paydown + value creation + exit, not a generic company description.
  • Prioritise cash flow stability and downside protection before upside narratives.
  • Use concrete operating items (working capital, maintenance capex, customer concentration) to sound deal-realistic.
  • Signal scenario thinking: mention downside case, covenant headroom, and interest-rate sensitivity.

Common Mistakes on LBO Candidate Traits

  • Listing traits without tying them to LBO returns (debt service, deleveraging, and exit value).
  • Saying “stable cash flows” but ignoring what drives cash (working capital swings, maintenance capex, tax, one-offs).
  • Overemphasising growth and multiple expansion while downplaying downside risk and covenant constraints.
  • Forgetting capital structure context (existing leverage, refinancing needs, maturity wall, liquidity).
  • Not mentioning red flags like customer concentration, cyclicality, or regulatory/commodity exposure.
  • Using buzzwords without specifics (e.g., “strong management team”) instead of actionable levers and measurable drivers.

Follow-Ups Seen in Private Equity Interview Questions

How would you assess debt capacity quickly for a potential LBO?

Start with sustainable EBITDA and estimate free cash flow, then size leverage off coverage (interest/FCF) and downside covenant headroom rather than a single leverage multiple.

What makes a company a bad LBO candidate even if EBITDA margins are high?

If cash conversion is poor—due to heavy maintenance capex, volatile working capital, or large contingent liabilities—high EBITDA won’t translate into debt paydown.

Which matters more: stability or growth in an LBO?

Stability usually drives higher leverage and safer deleveraging, while growth can drive equity upside; the “right” mix depends on how much leverage the deal requires to hit target returns.

How do add-on acquisitions change the LBO candidate profile?

They can enhance returns via synergies and multiple arbitrage, but you need integration capacity, a repeatable sourcing engine, and enough balance-sheet flexibility to fund the build-up.

In an interview, how would you identify good LBO candidates during interviews using only limited info?

Use a quick screen: revenue resilience, FCF conversion, capex intensity, working-capital stability, concentration, and a simple downside case to check whether leverage would still be serviceable.

LBO Interview Prep: How to Practise and Sound Deal-Ready

  • Build a 60–90 second “screening” version and a 3-minute “IC-ready” version; keep the same structure and only add depth when prompted.
  • Practise naming 6–8 traits, but always attach a “why it matters in an LBO” clause (e.g., “stable WC → predictable FCF → faster deleveraging”).
  • Rehearse two real-world examples (one great candidate, one weak) and be ready to cite 2–3 metrics you’d check (FCF conversion, maintenance capex %, concentration, cyclicality).
  • In AceTheRound, run a mock where you’re interrupted mid-answer; practise returning to your framework without restarting.

Ready to practice with AceTheRound?

Create an account to unlock AI mock interviews, feedback, and the full prep library.