AceTheRound
Interview questionInvestment BankingAnalystBehavioralIntermediate

How to Answer “Why Restructuring?” in Investment Banking Interviews

“Why Restructuring?” is a common prompt in investment banking interview prep because it reveals whether your motivation is specific, informed, and credible for an analyst role. It’s also one of those investment banking interview questions where a generic “I like challenging deals” answer can hurt you.

A strong response connects what restructuring work actually involves (distressed situations, stakeholder negotiations, liquidity and covenant pressure, downside scenarios) to your background (classes, internship exposure, case work, markets interest) and why now (learning goals and skill fit).

What “Why Restructuring?” Reveals in Investment Banking Interview Prep

Interviewers use “Why Restructuring?” to test whether you understand the day-to-day reality of restructuring versus M&A/ECM/DCM—especially the mix of technical analysis (liquidity, recovery, capital structure) and process (creditor dynamics, legal timelines, stakeholder management). They’re looking for signals you’ve done more than read headlines about bankruptcies.

They also assess judgement and maturity: restructuring often involves stressed management teams, time pressure, and imperfect information. A good candidate can explain why that environment is appealing professionally (problem-solving, downside protection, value preservation) without sounding like they “want companies to fail.”

Finally, they test communication and structure. This is a behavioural question, but strong candidates weave in credible technical touchpoints—linking to valuation interview prep themes like enterprise value allocation, recovery analysis, and scenario thinking—without turning it into a full technical lecture.

Answer Framework: IB Technical Questions Meets Motivation

  1. 1

    Step 1: Define restructuring and give your direct “why”

    Open with a one-sentence definition in plain English, then answer the question directly. For example: restructuring is advising companies and stakeholders when the capital structure no longer fits the business, with the goal of stabilising liquidity and allocating value fairly across stakeholders.

    Then state your personal “why” in 1–2 punchy reasons that feel tailored (e.g., you enjoy complex situations where both downside risk and stakeholder incentives matter; you like the mix of finance and process; you want reps in scenario-driven analysis). This first step should be confident and concise—no autobiography.

    Keep the motivation positive and professional: focus on helping businesses navigate stress, preserving value, and learning how capital structures behave under pressure. Avoid framing it as “I want to work on bankruptcies” without context.

  2. 2

    Step 2: Show you understand the work (technical + stakeholder lens)

    Demonstrate you know what you’d do as an analyst in restructuring. Mention 2–3 concrete workstreams: building a 13-week cash flow and liquidity runway, mapping the capital structure and covenants, modelling downside cases, and doing recovery / waterfall analyses across instruments.

    Add the stakeholder lens: outcomes are driven by negotiations among lenders, bondholders, sponsors, and trade creditors, often with legal constraints and tight timelines. This is where you can naturally reference how you think about valuation under stress—e.g., enterprise value ranges, going-concern vs liquidation, and why sensitivities matter.

    Keep this anchored to analyst execution. You’re signalling you can handle detail and ambiguity—similar to how ib technical questions test structure under pressure, just applied to distressed situations.

  3. 3

    Step 3: Tie to your background with one proof point

    Pick one specific experience that makes your interest believable: a credit-focused internship, a distressed case competition, a turnaround project, a markets/credit course, or even a well-explained self-study project. The goal is not to impress with jargon, but to prove you’ve engaged with the topic.

    Use a mini “situation–action–learning” arc: what you looked at (e.g., maturity wall, covenant headroom, liquidity runway), what you built (scenario model, simple recovery), and what you learned (small changes in assumptions can shift negotiating leverage).

    This proof point should connect to the team you’re interviewing for and the analyst role: strong modelling hygiene, careful assumptions, and crisp outputs for seniors—similar discipline you’d apply in a dcf interview answer, but with heavier downside and capital-structure focus.

  4. 4

    Step 4: Close with fit, trajectory, and why this platform

    Close by translating your interest into “why this seat” and “why now.” Mention the kind of reps you want early (live situations, creditor dynamics, rapid learning curve) and the skills you aim to build (credit analysis, restructuring modelling, communication under pressure).

    If appropriate, add one firm/team-specific fit point (without overpraising): e.g., strength in creditor-side mandates, sector exposure, or a track record of complex situations.

    Finish with a clear, forward-looking line that shows commitment: you want to start your investment banking career in restructuring because it builds rigorous downside thinking and stakeholder awareness—skills that compound across advisory careers and make you a stronger analyst.

Sample Answer for Investment Banking Interview Questions (Analyst)

Model answer

Restructuring appeals to me because it’s where finance, strategy, and real stakeholder incentives all show up at once. At a high level, restructuring is advising a company and its creditors when the balance sheet no longer fits the business, with the goal of stabilising liquidity and agreeing a solution that preserves value.

What draws me in is the combination of analytical intensity and real-world constraints. On the analytical side, you’re not just valuing an “upside case”—you’re building a view of liquidity runway, downside scenarios, and recoveries across the capital structure. I like work where assumptions matter and you have to be explicit about what drives value, whether that’s operating performance, asset coverage, or the timing of maturities.

I also like that outcomes are shaped by negotiations between management, lenders, bondholders, and other stakeholders. That dynamic feels more grounded to me than purely process-driven work because you need to understand what each party cares about and how the numbers translate into negotiating leverage.

My interest became concrete during a credit-focused project where we analysed a business facing a near-term maturity and tightening covenants. I built a simple liquidity model and downside cases, then mapped how value might flow through a waterfall under different outcomes. The key takeaway was how quickly the recommended path can change when you stress margins or working capital—so the discipline of scenario thinking really matters.

That’s why I’m targeting restructuring for my analyst role: I want to develop rigorous downside analysis and learn how capital structures behave under pressure, while working on situations where the advice has a tangible impact on the company’s path forward.

  • Lead with a plain-English definition, then your two reasons (analysis + stakeholder dynamics).
  • Show analyst-level tasks (liquidity, covenants, recovery) without drowning in jargon.
  • Keep the tone positive: “preserve value” and “stabilise” rather than “profit from failure.”
  • Include one concrete proof point; make the learning the punchline.
  • Close by linking to the analyst role and why this platform/team.

Best Practices: Avoid These Restructuring Answer Mistakes

  • Giving a generic motivation (“I like challenging deals”) without showing you understand restructuring work.
  • Sounding opportunistic or insensitive about distressed companies; focus on value preservation and problem-solving.
  • Turning the answer into a pure technical monologue (waterfalls, legal terms) and losing the behavioural point.
  • Not distinguishing restructuring from M&A/DCM; interviewers want to see you chose it deliberately.
  • Name-dropping concepts (covenants, DIP, Chapter 11) incorrectly or without context—better to be simple and accurate.
  • Failing to provide any proof point; even a small project or case is better than zero evidence.

Likely Follow-Ups (Liquidity, Recovery, Valuation Interview Prep)

How is restructuring different from M&A advisory?

M&A is typically about buying/selling businesses and optimising valuation/process, while restructuring is about solving a balance-sheet or liquidity problem under downside scenarios and stakeholder constraints.

What modelling do analysts do most in restructuring?

Common work includes 13-week cash flows, liquidity runway and covenant headroom, downside scenario cases, and recovery/waterfall analyses across the capital structure.

Do you prefer creditor-side or company-side work, and why?

Either can be compelling; I’m most interested in roles where I can build a clear view of recoveries and negotiate from that analysis, regardless of which side I’m advising.

What would you look at first if a company might need a restructuring?

Near-term liquidity and maturities first, then covenant headroom, operating levers (costs/working capital), and the capital structure to understand who has leverage.

How do you think about valuation in distressed situations?

I’d frame a range using going-concern vs downside outcomes, focus on key sensitivities, and translate enterprise value into stakeholder recoveries via a waterfall.

How to Practise and Improve Your Delivery

  • Write your answer as a 4-part structure (definition → 2 reasons → proof point → close) and rehearse it to ~60–90 seconds.
  • Stress-test your proof point: be ready to explain exactly what you modelled (inputs, outputs, and one key learning).
  • Prepare 3 technical anchors you can mention cleanly (liquidity runway, covenants, recovery/waterfall) in case the interviewer probes.
  • Record yourself once: remove filler and ensure the tone is professional and empathetic.
  • Practise on AceTheRound with behavioural + light technical follow-ups so you can stay structured under interruptions.

Ready to practice with AceTheRound?

Create an account to unlock AI mock interviews, feedback, and the full prep library.