How to Answer “Why investment banking instead of consulting?” in Investment Banking Interviews
“Why investment banking instead of consulting?” is one of the most common investment banking interview questions for analyst roles because it tests whether you understand what the job actually is—and whether your motivations match it.
In strong investment banking interview prep, aim to (1) show you’ve explored both paths, (2) choose banking for concrete, deal-specific reasons (not prestige), and (3) connect your choice to what you’ll do day-to-day as an analyst.
What Interviewers Look For in Investment Banking Interview Prep
Interviewers use this question to evaluate role clarity. They want evidence you understand the analyst reality in Investment Banking: transaction execution, valuation work, tight timelines, and high attention to detail—rather than a vague “finance is interesting” story.
They are also checking decision quality. If you’ve considered Consulting and still choose banking, you’re signalling you can compare options using relevant criteria (type of problems, pace, outputs, stakeholders) and commit to one path.
Finally, they’re testing risk and fit: whether you’re choosing banking for sustainable reasons (learning, markets, transactions, deal reps) and whether you can communicate your rationale crisply under pressure—similar to how you’ll explain analyses to associates and VPs.
Answer Framework: Banking vs Consulting (Analyst-Level)
- 1
Step 1: Start with a direct choice + one-sentence rationale
Open with a clear statement that you’re choosing Investment Banking, then give a tight rationale that stands on its own. This prevents rambling and shows conviction.
A good one-sentence rationale combines (a) transaction focus and (b) analyst-level work: “I’m choosing investment banking because I want to be closest to live transactions and build core valuation and execution skills by owning analyses under tight timelines.”
Avoid putting Consulting down. Instead, acknowledge what’s attractive about it (structured problem solving, broad exposure), then explain why your preferences map more strongly to banking. This keeps the tone professional and reduces the risk of sounding like you’re repeating a script from interview preparation forums.
- 2
Step 2: Use a 3-bucket comparison grounded in analyst tasks
Compare banking vs consulting across three job-relevant buckets. Keep it practical and tied to what an analyst actually does.
-
Output and accountability: Banking outputs are deal deliverables—valuation work, models, comps, and materials that support a financing or M&A process. Consulting outputs tend to be recommendations and implementation roadmaps.
-
Type of problem + pace: Banking is deadline-driven around market windows and deal processes. Consulting is often hypothesis-driven with longer project arcs.
-
Skill stack you want first: Call out technical foundations such as valuation interview prep topics (comps, precedent transactions, merger consequences) and how they translate to execution. You don’t need to turn it into ib technical questions, but you should reference the skills credibly.
This structure shows judgment and makes your “why” feel earned rather than generic.
-
- 3
Step 3: Prove it with one specific experience and what you learned
Add one concrete data point that demonstrates you’ve tested your preference. Examples that work well: a finance internship, a student investment fund project, a case competition with a transaction angle, shadowing, or informational conversations.
Use a simple mini-STAR: Situation/Task (what the project was), Action (what you did—modeling, comps, diligence-style research), Result (what changed/what you delivered), and Learning (why it confirmed banking).
Where relevant, reference a piece of valuation work in plain language: building a model, comparing trading multiples, or pressure-testing assumptions. If you mention a DCF, do it as proof of interest in fundamentals (not as a flex): “I liked how a DCF forces you to connect operating drivers to value,” which reads naturally and hints you can handle a future dcf interview answer.
- 4
Step 4: Close with role-specific enthusiasm + short-term commitment
End by bringing it back to the analyst role you’re interviewing for. Show you’re excited about the exact craft: clean analyses, detail work, iteration, and learning from feedback.
A strong close includes (a) the environment you want (fast feedback, steep learning curve), (b) the team setting (working closely with deal teams), and (c) a near-term goal (becoming technically sharp and reliable on live processes).
If you want a subtle conversion-friendly line, you can reference your approach to interview preparation: that you’re practising structured, repeatable answers and technical fundamentals. Keep it grounded—no exaggerated claims—just show you’re coachable and serious about the path.
Sample Answer for This Investment Banking Interview Question
I’m choosing Investment Banking over Consulting because I want to be closest to live transactions and build core valuation and execution skills early, in a role where the output directly supports an M&A or financing process.
What I like about consulting is the structured problem solving and broad exposure. But when I compare the two, banking matches how I like to work. First, the deliverables in banking are tangible and transaction-oriented—valuations, comps, and materials that help a client make a real capital allocation decision on a defined timeline. Second, I’m motivated by the pace and accountability of deal processes, where priorities can shift quickly and you have to be precise under time pressure. Third, I want to go deep on the technical toolkit—understanding what drives value, how assumptions flow through a model, and how you pressure-test outcomes—rather than focusing primarily on recommendations and longer implementation roadmaps.
I also tested this preference in my previous experience. In a recent finance project, I built a simple valuation using trading comps and a DCF to compare scenarios, and I enjoyed translating operating drivers into value and then explaining the sensitivities clearly. That work felt closer to the transaction questions I find most interesting.
That’s why I’m targeting investment banking analyst roles: I’m excited to develop as an execution-focused team member, get repetition on valuation and process work, and contribute reliably on live deals from day one.
- Make the first sentence a complete, quotable rationale (choice + why).
- Compare banking vs consulting on outputs, pace, and skill stack—without criticising consulting.
- Use one concrete experience to prove you’ve explored the work, not just the brand.
- Signal analyst realism: detail, iteration, deadlines, and coachability.
- Keep any valuation references high-level and intuitive—avoid turning it into a technical monologue.
Common Pitfalls Candidates Make vs Consulting
- Bashing Consulting or implying it’s “easier”; it makes you sound insecure and can backfire with interviewers who considered both paths.
- Leading with prestige, pay, or vague excitement instead of transaction-specific motivations and analyst-level responsibilities.
- Claiming you “love modelling” without evidence, or over-indexing on jargon that doesn’t connect to real deliverables.
- Giving a one-size-fits-all answer that could apply to any finance role; it should clearly map to deals, execution, and valuation work.
- Overpromising on hours or toughness (“I thrive on no sleep”) rather than showing sustainable motivations and discipline.
- Ignoring the client-service reality in banking (responsiveness, iteration, feedback loops) and focusing only on strategy.
Likely Follow-Ups (Including IB Technical Questions Signals)
What specifically do you think an investment banking analyst does day-to-day?
I expect to support deal teams through valuation and materials: building comps, updating models, drafting slides, tracking diligence items, and turning comments quickly with high attention to detail.
If you like valuation, why not equity research or asset management?
I’m most interested in valuation in the context of a live decision—M&A or financing—where the analysis directly supports execution and I can learn the full transaction process.
Which part of consulting appeals to you, and how will you get that in banking?
I like structured problem solving; in banking I get that through framing valuation drivers, scenario analysis, and synthesising diligence into clear decision-ready materials.
Give an example of a time you worked under a tight deadline.
I prioritised the critical path, communicated trade-offs early, and iterated quickly—delivering a clean first pass on time and improving it with feedback rather than chasing perfection upfront.
What banking product or industry are you most interested in, and why?
I’m open, but I’m particularly interested in areas with frequent transactions and clear valuation drivers; I’m choosing based on where I can get strong reps and learn from experienced teams.
Practice Plan: Valuation Interview Prep and Delivery
- Build a 60–90 second version first: choice + 3-bucket comparison + one proof point. Then add detail only if the interviewer pulls.
- Pressure-test your reasons: for each point, ask “Would this still be true at 1am on a live deal?” Keep the motivations realistic.
- Tie to valuation basics without overdoing it: one line that shows you’ve done valuation interview prep (comps/DCF intuition) is enough.
- Rehearse with interruption: practise delivering your answer while someone asks follow-ups (day-to-day, why not ER, toughest deadline). AceTheRound-style mock interview practice helps you tighten structure and pacing.
- Record and edit for clarity: remove filler, replace vague words (“dynamic”, “fast-paced”) with concrete outputs (“deal deliverables”, “scenario analysis”, “client timeline”).
Ready to practice with AceTheRound?
Create an account to unlock AI mock interviews, feedback, and the full prep library.