How to Answer “Why do you want to work in this group (e.g., M&A, TMT, Healthcare)?” in Investment Banking Interviews
“Why do you want to work in this group (e.g., M&A, TMT, Healthcare)?” is a common prompt within investment banking interview questions because groups hire for different workflows, client problems, and learning curves.
In your investment banking interview prep, treat it as a “preference + evidence” answer: pick a group, show you understand the analyst day-to-day, and prove your interest is specific enough to survive follow-ups.
What They’re Testing in Investment Banking Interview Questions
Interviewers are testing whether your motivation is specific, informed, and consistent with what the group actually does. It’s not enough to say you “like deals” or “like modelling”—they want to hear the repeatable work patterns (process execution, materials, diligence, modelling, stakeholder coordination) and why you want that.
They’re also checking judgment and commercial awareness. A strong answer can reference one deal or sector trend and briefly explain the value drivers and risks the group would care about. This is where a behavioural question can quickly blend into light ib technical questions (e.g., what drives multiples, what diligence would focus on, how you’d think about synergy value).
Finally, they’re assessing communication and credibility: can you deliver a structured 60–120 second “investment banking group preference interview response,” avoid sounding interchangeable across M&A/TMT/Healthcare, and stay defensible when the interviewer pushes deeper.
Framework for a Credible Group Preference Interview Response
- 1
Step 1: Choose one group and anchor it to the work
Start with a clear preference (one primary group), then give a one-line rationale tied to the group’s core workflow—not prestige, exits, or a vague “fast-paced” claim.
Make the rationale concrete by referencing what “good” looks like in that seat:
- M&A: running a process across workstreams, coordinating diligence, thinking through structure/synergies and competing bidders.
- TMT: KPI-heavy narratives, fast-evolving business models, frequent valuation dispersion as sentiment changes.
- Healthcare: complexity from regulation/reimbursement, differentiated diligence, and underwriting around clinical/adoption milestones.
If you’re genuinely flexible, frame it as “my first choice is X” rather than “I’ll do anything.” It reads more mature—and it sets up a cleaner story for the rest of your answer.
- 2
Step 2: Provide 2–3 proofs (experience, deal/trend, and team insight)
Back your preference with two or three specific proofs. Aim for a mix that shows you’ve done more than read headlines:
-
Experience proof: an internship task, student fund write-up, case competition, or self-built analysis that mirrors the group’s outputs (process tracking, comps, memo writing, diligence questions, basic modelling).
-
Market/deal proof: one transaction or sector trend you can summarise in 2–3 sentences: buyer rationale, one key driver, one key risk.
-
Team proof: one concrete takeaway from speaking with bankers (how staffing works, typical responsibilities for analysts, feedback cadence) that matches how you learn.
This is a natural place to signal valuation interview prep without turning it into a technical monologue—e.g., how you’d triangulate comps and precedents, or when a simple DCF cross-check is useful.
-
- 3
Step 3: Translate interest into analyst-level performance signals
Convert “why I like it” into “why I’ll perform in it.” Pick 2–3 analyst-relevant strengths and tie each to deliverables you’ll actually produce.
Examples:
- M&A: comfort juggling parallel workstreams, being meticulous on materials, and synthesising diligence into a clear story.
- TMT: learning new business models quickly, using the right operating KPIs, and keeping narrative and valuation aligned.
- Healthcare: structured thinking with messy information, discipline in assumptions, and crisp communication of what matters.
Avoid over-claiming (“I’m a perfect fit”) or focusing only on modelling. Good analysts also iterate quickly, QC their work, and coordinate inputs under time pressure—show you understand the unglamorous parts and still want the role.
- 4
Step 4: Prepare one depth point for ib technical questions (without going off-track)
Expect a follow-up that nudges into ib technical questions. Prepare one “depth” point that’s group-relevant and practical, so you can go a layer deeper without sounding scripted.
Examples of defensible depth:
- M&A: how synergies and integration risk affect what you diligence and what a buyer can pay.
- TMT: why retention, revenue quality (recurring vs usage), and growth efficiency can move multiples.
- Healthcare: why reimbursement assumptions, regulatory milestones, and adoption pace can dominate underwriting.
If the interviewer asks for valuation, give a short dcf interview answer framing (purpose, key drivers, and a sanity-check) rather than reciting formulas. The goal is to show readiness and judgment, not to “win” on technical detail.
- 5
Step 5: Close with “why this platform/team” and a commitment line
Finish by reducing hiring risk: confirm you understand what the group’s day-to-day involves and why you want to do it here. One specific sentence is enough if it’s factual.
Good “why this team” inputs include: the group’s deal mix, typical analyst reps, how juniors get staffed, how feedback is delivered, or how the team collaborates with other groups.
Close with a simple commitment line: it’s your first choice, you’ve validated the fit, and you’re ready to contribute. For practice on AceTheRound, aim for a tight 75–90 second version first, then be ready to expand if prompted.
Model Answer: Investment Banking Interview Prep for “Why This Group?”
My first choice is TMT because I’m most motivated by businesses where the operating narrative and the numbers have to match—unit economics, retention, and growth efficiency—and where you need to update your view quickly as the market and competitive landscape change.
That preference comes from two experiences. In my last internship, I supported a coverage team by updating comps and drafting a short industry snapshot for a software sub-vertical. I enjoyed translating operating KPIs into a clear set of valuation drivers rather than treating the multiple as a black box. Separately, I’ve followed a few recent TMT transactions where the debate wasn’t just price, but revenue quality and durability—how much of growth was repeatable, what churn implied about product fit, and what the buyer could realistically improve post-close.
From an analyst perspective, I think I’d do well in TMT because I’m comfortable learning new business models quickly and being precise with definitions—making sure KPIs like ARR, net retention, and CAC payback are consistent across the model and the deck. I also like the iteration cycle: incorporating new data, pressure-testing assumptions, and tightening the story without losing accuracy.
Finally, from conversations with analysts in this team, it sounds like juniors get real ownership on the KPI work and client materials with frequent feedback. That’s the learning environment I’m looking for, and why TMT is my top group choice.
- States a clear group preference and ties it to the group’s real work (KPIs, narrative, valuation drivers).
- Uses two concrete proofs (internship output + deal/trend observation) that are easy to defend under probing.
- Signals analyst-level deliverables (comps, snapshots, KPI definitions, deck consistency) rather than abstract interest.
- Adds light commercial judgment (revenue quality/durability) that can bridge into valuation follow-ups.
- Closes with a specific “why this team” based on conversations, not generic praise.
Common Pitfalls When Choosing M&A, TMT, or Healthcare
- Sounding interchangeable across groups by using vague lines (“I like fast-paced work”) without group-specific detail.
- Saying you want M&A/TMT/Healthcare because of exits or prestige; it reads like you’ll switch as soon as you can.
- Name-dropping a deal but not explaining the buyer’s rationale, the key value driver, and one real risk.
- Over-indexing on “I love modelling” and ignoring process execution, materials, diligence, and coordination.
- Going too technical too early (turning it into a DCF lecture) instead of answering the preference question first.
- Criticising other groups to justify your choice; it creates cultural and staffing risk.
Follow-Ups That Blend Fit With IB Technical Questions
Why this group versus another (e.g., M&A vs TMT, or Healthcare vs TMT)?
I’m optimising for the day-to-day workflow: M&A is broader and process-heavy, while TMT/Healthcare lean more on sector drivers and KPIs; my preference matches where I’ve enjoyed the work most.
What deal or trend have you been following in this space, and what matters most?
I’d summarise the buyer’s rationale, one key value driver (e.g., synergies, retention, reimbursement tailwinds) and one risk (e.g., integration, regulation, customer concentration).
If you had to sanity-check valuation quickly, what would you look at?
I’d triangulate trading comps and precedents using the right KPIs, and use a light DCF check only if long-term margins and reinvestment assumptions can be supported.
What are the key KPIs you’d focus on in TMT or Healthcare?
In TMT: retention and revenue quality, plus growth efficiency; in Healthcare: reimbursement/regulatory drivers, adoption, and patient/provider mix alongside core financial metrics.
How do you know you’ll enjoy the analyst job, not just the idea of the group?
I’ve validated it through similar tasks under deadlines and by speaking with current analysts about workflow, iterations, and what juniors actually own on live deals.
Practice Plan: Valuation Interview Prep and Sharper Delivery
- Draft a 4-part outline and rehearse it: preference → 2–3 proofs → analyst fit → why this team (structure over memorisation).
- Build a one-page “group brief” for M&A, TMT, or Healthcare: typical work, value drivers, risks, and 5 KPIs you can define cleanly.
- Prepare one optional depth add-on: a 20–30 second dcf interview answer framing or how you’d triangulate comps/precedents in that group.
- Record a 75–90 second version and cut anything that doesn’t add evidence or analyst-level realism.
- Run a timed mock on AceTheRound and ask for feedback specifically on: specificity, defensibility under follow-ups, and whether your reasons sound group-true.
Ready to practice with AceTheRound?
Create an account to unlock AI mock interviews, feedback, and the full prep library.