How to Answer “What’s the difference between a spin-off, split-off, and carve-out?” in Investment Banking Interviews
In investment banking interview prep, this is a common corporate restructuring technical: “What’s the difference between a spin-off, split-off, and carve-out?” A strong answer is not just definitions—it’s who ends up owning what, whether cash is raised, what happens to control, and how each structure shows up in valuation and deal mechanics.
Below is a clean framework you can use for this spin-off split-off carve-out interview question, plus an analyst-level sample response and likely follow-ups.
What Interviewers Look For in Corporate Restructuring Answers
Interviewers use this prompt to test whether you understand core investment banking concepts around corporate separations: ownership outcomes, capital structure implications, and the transaction’s strategic purpose (unlock value, raise capital, separate businesses, reduce conglomerate discount).
They’re also checking deal literacy: whether you can distinguish distribution vs exchange vs IPO, and whether you naturally mention mechanics like pro rata share distribution, tender/exchange offers, lock-ups, and retained stakes.
Finally, they want judgement and communication under pressure—can you explain it simply, tie it to valuation techniques for interviews (sum-of-the-parts, comps, float/market pricing), and flag the practical “why choose this structure” trade-offs that come up in IB technical interview questions.
Spin-Off vs Split-Off vs Carve-Out Framework (IB Technicals)
- 1
Step 1: Start with the one-line definitions (distribution vs exchange vs IPO)
Open with crisp, mutually exclusive definitions:
- Spin-off: parent distributes shares of a subsidiary to existing parent shareholders (typically pro rata), creating two public companies. Shareholders usually keep both.
- Split-off: parent exchanges subsidiary shares for parent shares via a tender/exchange offer—shareholders choose to swap, so they end up owning either parent or the new company.
- Carve-out (equity carve-out): parent sells a minority stake of the subsidiary to public investors via an IPO, usually retaining control initially.
This first step is about preventing the common confusion: spin-off and split-off are shareholder-level restructurings, while a carve-out is a capital markets transaction that raises cash.
- 2
Step 2: Compare outcomes across four dimensions (ownership, cash, control, share count)
Then compare using a consistent set of buckets (this is what makes your answer “interview-ready”):
- Who owns the sub after the deal?
- Spin-off: existing parent holders own both (pro rata).
- Split-off: only participating holders own the sub; non-participants stay with parent.
- Carve-out: parent + new public investors; parent typically retains a majority stake.
- Does the parent raise cash?
- Spin-off / split-off: typically no primary cash proceeds to parent (though there can be debt moves/dividends).
- Carve-out: yes, IPO proceeds (primary/secondary depending on structure).
- Control and consolidation:
- Spin-off / split-off: subsidiary becomes independent; parent control ends.
- Carve-out: parent often keeps control and may consolidate until a later full separation.
- Share count / EPS optics:
- Spin-off: parent share count unchanged; holders receive new shares.
- Split-off: parent share count can decline (buyback-like effect) because shares are tendered.
- Carve-out: subsidiary has a public float; parent’s ownership is diluted only to the extent of shares sold.
- 3
Step 3: Tie to deal rationale and investor/valuation implications
Next, explain why a company would pick one structure over another—this is where you differentiate yourself on investment banking interview questions on corporate restructuring.
- Spin-off is often used to create pure-play businesses and potentially reduce a conglomerate discount, with minimal execution complexity and broad shareholder participation.
- Split-off can be used when the parent wants a more targeted shareholder base for the new company and wants to shrink parent equity (because the exchange reduces parent shares outstanding). It can also be helpful if management wants to “separate” shareholders who prefer different risk/return profiles.
- Carve-out is often chosen to raise capital, establish a market valuation for the subsidiary, create acquisition currency, and stage a separation over time (with the option of a later spin-off of the remaining stake).
Valuation angle (keep it high level): carve-outs create a traded price for the sub; spin-/split-offs often rely on sum-of-the-parts logic and post-separation re-rating rather than immediate cash price discovery.
- 4
Step 4: Add one concrete example and two sanity checks
Close by grounding the definitions with a simple, numeric-friendly example and quick checks.
Example template: “ParentCo owns 100% of SubCo.”
- Spin-off: ParentCo distributes SubCo shares to ParentCo holders; holders now own ParentCo + SubCo.
- Split-off: ParentCo offers SubCo shares in exchange for ParentCo shares; tendering holders end up with SubCo; ParentCo share count falls.
- Carve-out: ParentCo IPOs, say, 20% of SubCo to the public; ParentCo keeps 80% and usually control.
Sanity checks:
- Ask: “Do shareholders end up with both stocks (spin-off) or choose one (split-off)?”
- Ask: “Is there IPO cash raised and a new public float (carve-out)?”
That wraps the “difference between spin-off split-off carve-out explained” in a way that’s easy to deliver in 60–90 seconds, with optional depth if pushed.
Sample Answer: Spin-Off, Split-Off, and Carve-Out (Analyst Level)
A spin-off is when a parent distributes shares of a subsidiary to its existing shareholders, typically pro rata, so shareholders usually end up owning both the parent and the new independent company.
A split-off is similar in that the subsidiary becomes independent, but the key difference is the mechanism: shareholders are offered an exchange where they tender parent shares and receive subsidiary shares. So investors generally end up owning either the parent or the new company, and the parent’s share count can go down.
A carve-out, or equity carve-out, is different because it’s an IPO: the parent sells a minority stake of the subsidiary to public investors, which typically raises cash and creates a public market price for the subsidiary, while the parent often retains control initially.
If I put it into one example: if ParentCo owns 100% of SubCo, a spin-off distributes SubCo shares to ParentCo holders; a split-off exchanges SubCo shares for tendered ParentCo shares; and a carve-out might IPO 10–30% of SubCo to create float and proceeds. The quick checks I use are: do shareholders keep both stocks versus choose one, and is there IPO cash and a retained stake.
- Lead with the mechanism: distribute (spin-off) vs exchange (split-off) vs IPO (carve-out).
- Use the two fast checks: ‘both vs either’ and ‘cash raised or not’.
- Mention control/retained stake for carve-outs; it’s the most commonly missed point.
- If prompted, bridge to valuation: carve-out creates price discovery; spin-/split-offs are more about post-separation re-rating and SOTP.
Common Mistakes in Investment Banking Concepts Questions
- Saying all three are “selling a division” and ignoring that spin-offs and split-offs are usually distributions/exchanges rather than cash sales.
- Missing the shareholder outcome: in a spin-off shareholders typically own both entities; in a split-off they choose to swap and end up with one.
- Forgetting that a carve-out is an IPO with a new public float and often a retained controlling stake at the parent.
- Over-indexing on accounting details (consolidation, EPS) without first nailing the simple mechanics and control/cash points.
- Not explaining why a company would choose each route (capital raise, staged separation, shareholder base targeting, share count reduction).
- Giving no example—this question is easiest to clarify with a 100%-owned sub and a 20% IPO carve-out scenario.
Follow-Ups Linked to Valuation Techniques for Interviews
Why might a company choose a carve-out instead of a spin-off?
A carve-out can raise IPO proceeds, establish market price discovery for the subsidiary, and allow a staged separation while the parent retains control initially.
How does a split-off resemble a share buyback for the parent?
Because shareholders tender parent shares in the exchange, the parent’s shares outstanding can decline, similar to the effect of repurchasing shares.
What valuation techniques would you mention when discussing these separations?
At a high level: sum-of-the-parts to frame the implied value split, trading comps for each standalone business, and in a carve-out the IPO price provides additional market-based reference.
What typically happens to the parent’s retained stake after a carve-out?
Often the parent later monetises or distributes the remaining shares, frequently via a follow-on offering, secondary sale, or a subsequent spin-off of the retained stake.
How to Practise This Spin-Off/Split-Off/Carve-Out Interview Question
- Practise a 60–90 second version that starts with “distribution vs exchange vs IPO,” then add the four comparison buckets only if needed.
- Drill two examples you can reuse in interviews: (1) 100% owned subsidiary separated via spin/split, (2) 20% equity carve-out IPO with parent retaining 80%.
- For IB technical interview questions, record yourself and check: did you clearly state (a) shareholder outcome, (b) cash/no cash, (c) control/retained stake?
- In AceTheRound, run a mock where the interviewer keeps interrupting—your goal is to stay structured and answer in layers (headline first, details second).
Ready to practice with AceTheRound?
Create an account to unlock AI mock interviews, feedback, and the full prep library.