How to Answer “What’s the difference between enterprise value multiples and equity value multiples?” in Investment Banking Interviews
In investment banking interview prep, this is one of the most common valuation prompts: “What’s the difference between enterprise value multiples and equity value multiples?” A strong answer shows you can match the right numerator to the right denominator, explain the capital structure implications, and avoid the classic apples-to-oranges mistake.
At the analyst level, interviewers want you to be fast and precise: define each multiple type, name the standard examples (EV/EBITDA vs P/E), and state when you’d choose one over the other in real Investment Banking work.
What Interviewers Look For in IB Technical Interview Questions on Multiples
First, they’re testing whether you understand the Enterprise Value vs Equity Value bridge and what each represents in a valuation context. Enterprise value is the value of the operations available to all capital providers (debt and equity), while equity value is what’s left for shareholders—so the multiple you pick must align with who the cash flows belong to.
Second, they’re testing technical hygiene on ib technical interview questions: correct numerator/denominator pairing, minority interest and preferreds treatment, and knowing why EV multiples are typically more comparable across companies (capital-structure neutral) than equity multiples.
Third, they’re testing communication and judgement: can you explain why EV/EBITDA is widely used, when P/E is misleading (negative earnings, different leverage), and how you’d sanity-check a comps table in a live deal process.
Enterprise Value Multiples vs Equity Value Multiples: A Clear Answer Framework
- 1
Step 1: Define Enterprise Value and Equity Value (and who they belong to)
Start with tight definitions and the ownership logic. Enterprise Value (EV) is the value of the core business attributable to all providers of capital—equity holders plus debt and other claimholders. Equity Value is the value attributable only to common shareholders (market cap on a public company, or implied equity value in a deal).
Then connect that to the interview question: EV-based multiples use EV in the numerator and a metric that accrues to all capital providers (e.g., EBITDA, EBIT, unlevered FCF) in the denominator. Equity-based multiples use Equity Value in the numerator and a metric that accrues to equity holders (e.g., net income, levered FCF) in the denominator.
A clean one-liner helps: EV multiples are typically capital-structure neutral, equity multiples are capital-structure sensitive. That sets up the rest of your answer.
- 2
Step 2: Match the right multiples and explain the mechanics (valuation multiples explained)
Give the standard mapping and the “apples-to-apples” rule. Common enterprise value multiples: EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, EV/Revenue (especially when profits are low/negative). Common equity value multiples: P/E and Price / Book (for certain financials), and sometimes Price / FCF if you’re clearly using levered FCF.
Explain the mechanics: EV is typically calculated as Equity Value + Net Debt + Preferred + Minority Interest − Non-operating cash (exact adjustments can vary by convention). The denominator should be a pre-financing measure (EBITDA/EBIT) for EV multiples because interest expense and leverage choices shouldn’t drive the metric.
Close the step by stating why interviewers like EV/EBITDA: it’s available for most companies, less distorted by capital structure, and often a cleaner basis for an investment banking valuation multiples comparison across peers.
- 3
Step 3: Explain when each is more appropriate (equity value multiples overview)
Show judgement on selection. Use EV multiples when (1) leverage differs materially across peers, (2) you want to compare operating performance independent of financing, or (3) net income is volatile/negative. EV/Revenue is common for early-stage, high-growth, or turnaround situations where EBITDA isn’t meaningful.
Use equity multiples when the equity claim is the focus and earnings are comparable—e.g., stable, profitable businesses with similar leverage profiles, or when the market quotes and investor narratives are framed in P/E terms. Equity multiples can also be relevant when regulatory capital or balance-sheet structure is central (though your choice depends on sector and what investors anchor on).
Add one interview-grade nuance: equity multiples embed both operating performance and financing (interest, taxes, leverage), so they can diverge even when two businesses have similar enterprise economics.
- 4
Step 4: Add a quick numeric example + sanity checks (how to explain enterprise value multiples in IB)
Use a 20–30 second example to make it concrete. Suppose Company A and Company B both have $100m EBITDA. A has $0 net debt, B has $300m net debt. If both trade at 10.0x EV/EBITDA, both have EV = $1,000m. But their equity values differ: A’s equity is ~$1,000m, while B’s equity is ~$700m (ignoring other adjustments). That’s the core reason EV multiples and equity multiples can tell different stories.
Then give quick checks you’d do on a comps page: (1) ensure EV multiple denominators are pre-interest metrics, (2) ensure P/E uses consistent earnings (LTM vs NTM, reported vs adjusted), and (3) watch for items that break comparability—negative EBITDA, unusual tax rates, large non-operating assets, or meaningful minority interest/preferred securities.
If you want an interview-friendly wrap: EV multiples compare businesses; equity multiples compare what equity holders get after the capital structure.
Analyst-Level Model Answer for Valuation Multiples Explained
Enterprise value multiples use enterprise value in the numerator and an operating metric in the denominator, while equity value multiples use equity value in the numerator and an equity earnings metric in the denominator. In other words, EV multiples value the business for all capital providers, and equity multiples value just the shareholders’ claim.
Enterprise Value is the value of the operations attributable to both debt and equity holders, so the denominator should be pre-financing—typically EBITDA or EBIT. That’s why EV/EBITDA or EV/EBIT are common: they’re more comparable across companies with different leverage because they’re relatively capital-structure neutral.
Equity Value is what’s left for common shareholders, so equity multiples pair with metrics after interest and taxes—most commonly P/E, where price is equity value per share and earnings are net income per share. Those multiples are more sensitive to leverage and financing choices, because interest expense and tax effects flow through to net income.
A quick way to sanity-check is the apples-to-apples rule: if the numerator is EV, the denominator should be unlevered; if the numerator is equity value, the denominator should be levered. For example, two companies can trade at the same EV/EBITDA but different P/E if one has more net debt—its equity value is lower and its net income can be affected by interest.
In an Investment Banking comps set, I’d generally anchor on EV/EBITDA or EV/EBIT for cross-company comparability, and use P/E as a cross-check when earnings are stable and capital structures are similar.
- Lead with a two-sentence definition that answers the question directly.
- Use the apples-to-apples pairing rule (EV with unlevered metrics; equity with levered metrics).
- Name 2–3 standard multiples on each side (EV/EBITDA vs P/E) to signal practical familiarity.
- Add one short leverage example to show you understand why the multiples diverge.
- Keep adjustment details high-level unless the interviewer asks (preferred, minority interest, non-operating cash).
Common Mistakes in Enterprise vs Equity Multiple Explanations
- Mixing numerators and denominators (e.g., using EV with net income), which creates an apples-to-oranges multiple.
- Saying EV multiples “ignore debt” instead of explaining that EV includes debt and is paired with pre-financing metrics.
- Overclaiming that EV/EBITDA is always best; failing to mention cases where EBITDA is negative or revenue multiples are used.
- Forgetting that equity multiples are capital-structure sensitive and can move due to leverage or interest rates even if operations are unchanged.
- Ignoring key EV bridge items (minority interest, preferred equity, non-operating cash) that can matter in real comps work.
Follow-Ups: Equity Value Multiples Overview and Comps Nuances
Why is EV/EBITDA used so often in comps?
It’s widely available, relatively comparable across different leverage levels, and EBITDA is a pre-financing proxy for operating cash generation (though it still ignores capex and working capital).
Can you use P/E to compare two companies with different leverage?
You can, but you need caution: P/E is affected by interest expense and taxes, so leverage differences can drive P/E even when the underlying enterprise economics are similar.
If a company has negative EBITDA, what multiple might you use?
EV/Revenue is common, or you shift to a forward period where profitability normalises; you can also use sector-specific operating metrics if they’re standard for the peer set.
How do minority interest and preferred equity affect EV multiples?
They’re added into enterprise value because they represent claims on the business; you also need consistency between EV and the operating metric (e.g., consolidate EBITDA if you consolidate the subsidiary).
What’s the difference between EV/EBITDA and EV/EBIT?
EV/EBITDA is before D&A, while EV/EBIT includes D&A—so EV/EBIT better reflects differences in depreciation and capital intensity, but can be noisier across accounting policies.
Practice Plan for Investment Banking Interview Prep (Multiples)
- Practise a 60–90 second version that includes: definitions, the pairing rule, and 2 example multiples on each side.
- Drill one numeric leverage example so you can explain why EV multiples and equity multiples diverge without rambling.
- Rehearse the three most common follow-ups (why EV/EBITDA, when P/E is misleading, what to do with negative EBITDA).
- In AceTheRound, run this as a timed response and review whether you stated the answer in the first two sentences and stayed apples-to-apples.
Ready to practice with AceTheRound?
Create an account to unlock AI mock interviews, feedback, and the full prep library.