AceTheRound
Interview questionInvestment BankingAnalystTechnicalIntermediate

How to Answer “How do you build a DCF sensitivity table (e.g., WACC vs. terminal growth or exit multiple)?” in Investment Banking Interviews

In investment banking interview prep, interviewers often ask: “How do you build a DCF sensitivity table (e.g., WACC vs. terminal growth or exit multiple)?” because it reveals whether you can translate a working DCF into a clean valuation range.

A strong answer is practical and auditable: finish the base DCF, pick the two highest-impact assumptions (usually WACC and a terminal value driver), build a proper two-variable data table in Excel, and then interpret the grid as a range with clear sanity checks.

What Interviewers Look For in IB Technical Interview Questions

This prompt tests whether you understand what a DCF sensitivity table is used for: quantifying how valuation shifts when the most uncertain, highest-leverage inputs change—typically the discount rate (WACC) and terminal value assumptions.

It also checks modelling discipline under time pressure, which is central to ib technical interview questions: can you anchor the table to a single output cell, link the row/column inputs to the correct assumption cells, and avoid enterprise vs equity value confusion.

Finally, it’s a judgement and communication test (key in valuation modeling interview prep). Interviewers want to hear sensible ranges, quick monotonicity checks (does value move in the right direction?), and a conclusion that frames results as a valuation range rather than a false sense of precision.

DCF Sensitivity Table Framework for Investment Banking Interview Prep

  1. 1

    Step 1: Finish the base DCF and define one output cell

    Start by stating you only build sensitivities after the base DCF is complete and consistent. Your model should have one clear output cell that you’ll table—most commonly implied equity value per share (or equity value), already reflecting: PV of forecast free cash flows, PV of terminal value, the enterprise-to-equity bridge (net debt and other adjustments), and diluted shares.

    Emphasise auditability: the sensitivity table must reference one output cell that updates as inputs change. In interviews, implied price per share is often the cleanest output because it’s directly interpretable; if you use enterprise value, you should say how you’ll bridge to equity.

    Clarify the terminal value method before you build the table (perpetuity growth vs exit multiple) and avoid mixing terminal approaches in one grid.

  2. 2

    Step 2: Pick the two variables and set ranges with rationale

    Explain that the classic two-way sensitivity varies WACC on one axis and a terminal driver on the other:

    • WACC vs terminal growth (g) if using a perpetuity-growth terminal value.
    • WACC vs exit multiple (e.g., EV/EBITDA) if using an exit-multiple terminal value.

    For ranges, show judgement rather than arbitrary spreads. A typical interview-ready setup might use 5–9 points per axis (e.g., WACC in 0.5% increments across a ~2–3% band; g in 0.25% increments across ~0.5–1.0%; exit multiple in 0.5x increments across ~2–4 turns), centred on your base case.

    Add reasonableness anchors: terminal growth should generally be below long-run nominal growth in the relevant market; exit multiples should be consistent with comps/precedents and your forecast-year margins.

  3. 3

    Step 3: Build the two-variable Data Table (row vs column input cells)

    Walk through the Excel mechanics clearly (this is where many candidates get vague). You create a grid where the top-left cell (the cell above the matrix) links to your chosen DCF output (e.g., implied share price).

    Then:

    • Put one variable down the rows (e.g., WACC values).
    • Put the other variable across the columns (e.g., terminal growth rates or exit multiples).

    Use Excel What-If Analysis → Data Table:

    • The Row input cell must link to the model assumption cell for the row variable (e.g., the WACC input cell).
    • The Column input cell must link to the model assumption cell for the column variable (e.g., terminal growth or exit multiple input).

    Practical modelling hygiene: keep sensitised assumptions in dedicated input cells (not hard-coded inside formulas), and remember data tables can slow large models—so you may switch calculation settings once built.

  4. 4

    Step 4: Validate directionality and explain what the table implies

    After the table populates, sanity-check it quickly. Valuation should decrease as WACC increases, and increase as terminal growth or exit multiple increases. If it’s not monotonic, it usually means the table references the wrong input cells, the output cell doesn’t depend on the inputs you’re varying, or there’s a circularity issue.

    Then interpret the output like an analyst: call out the base-case cell and summarise a reasonable valuation band around it rather than presenting a single point estimate. In dcf sensitivity analysis in investment banking, WACC and terminal value often drive a large portion of the valuation, so the table is a tool to communicate robustness.

    Close with an insight: if small moves in WACC or terminal assumptions swing value materially, revisit discount rate inputs (beta/ERP, capital structure, after-tax cost of debt) and ensure the terminal assumptions are consistent with the business’s long-term economics.

Analyst Model Answer: DCF Sensitivity Table Mechanics

Model answer

I build a DCF sensitivity table only after the base DCF is complete and producing one clean output cell—typically implied equity value per share—so the table always points to a single auditable result.

Then I choose the two biggest value drivers to sensitise: WACC on one axis and a terminal value driver on the other. If I’m using a perpetuity terminal value, that’s terminal growth (g); if I’m using an exit terminal value, that’s the exit multiple (like EV/EBITDA). I set ranges that bracket plausible outcomes around my base case—for example WACC in 0.5% steps across a couple of percentage points, and either terminal growth in 0.25% steps or the exit multiple in 0.5x steps—based on long-run growth constraints and comps.

Mechanically, I lay out the grid with the top-left corner linked to the DCF output cell, put WACC values down the rows and g or the exit multiple across the columns, and then run Excel’s two-variable Data Table. The row input cell links to the WACC assumption cell in the model, and the column input cell links to the terminal growth or exit multiple assumption cell.

Finally, I sanity-check directionality—higher WACC should reduce value and higher terminal assumptions should increase it—and I summarise the results as an implied valuation range and what the model is most sensitive to.

  • State ‘base DCF first’ to show the sensitivity is built on a consistent model, not a spreadsheet trick.
  • Anchor the table to a single output cell (often price per share) to avoid EV vs equity confusion.
  • Name the tool (two-variable Data Table) and specify row vs column input cells—this is what interviewers listen for.
  • Show judgement on ranges: growth bounded by long-run economics; multiples tied to comps and profitability.

Common Pitfalls in DCF Sensitivity Analysis (WACC & Terminal Value)

  • Anchoring the table to the wrong output (or multiple outputs), so results are hard to reconcile to the main DCF.
  • Mixing enterprise value and equity value in the explanation without stating the bridge (net debt and diluted shares).
  • Using unrealistic ranges (e.g., terminal growth above plausible long-run nominal growth, or exit multiples disconnected from comps).
  • Pointing the Data Table row/column inputs to the wrong cells (or to hard-coded values inside formulas), producing a grid that looks right but isn’t linked.
  • Sensitising two terminal methods at once (e.g., changing both g and exit multiple), which muddles interpretation.
  • Skipping monotonicity checks; if value doesn’t move predictably with WACC and terminal assumptions, the setup is likely broken.

Follow-Ups Seen in Valuation Modeling Interview Prep

When would you use WACC vs terminal growth versus WACC vs exit multiple?

Use WACC vs terminal growth when your terminal value is a perpetuity (g) approach; use WACC vs exit multiple when terminal value is based on an exit multiple—present one approach at a time.

Where should the table output be—enterprise value or equity value per share?

Either is fine, but equity value per share is usually easiest to discuss in interviews; if you use enterprise value, be explicit about the net debt and share count bridge.

How do you choose a reasonable terminal growth rate?

It should be consistent with sustainable long-run economics in the company’s main market and typically below long-run nominal growth; also check it doesn’t imply implausible terminal margins or reinvestment.

Why does valuation move so much with small WACC changes?

WACC affects the discounting of all cash flows and especially terminal value, which is often a large share of total value, so the sensitivity is high and non-linear.

How do you quickly debug a sensitivity table that looks wrong?

Reconcile the base-case cell to the main DCF output, confirm row/column input cells point to the correct assumptions, and check monotonicity (WACC up → value down; g/multiple up → value up).

How to Practise Building the Table Under Interview Time Pressure

  • Practise a 60–90 second step by step guide to DCF sensitivity tables: base output → choose WACC + terminal driver → build Data Table → interpret range.
  • Rebuild an investment banking DCF sensitivity table example from memory in a blank file: one output cell, two assumption cells, correct row/column mapping.
  • Drill your range rationale out loud (WACC banding, g bounded by long-run growth, exit multiples tied to comps and margins).
  • Time yourself answering as if it were one of the core ib technical interview questions—clear, structured, and free of Excel rabbit holes.
  • Use AI mock interviews to get feedback on whether you’re mixing EV vs equity, and whether your explanation sounds like you’ve actually built the table.

Ready to practice with AceTheRound?

Create an account to unlock AI mock interviews, feedback, and the full prep library.