How to Answer “How do convertible bonds work and how would you model conversion?” in Investment Banking Interviews
In convertible bonds interview prep, one of the most common advanced prompts is: “How do convertible bonds work and how would you model conversion?” In Investment Banking interviews, they’re looking for you to explain the security in plain language, then switch into clean, assumption-driven financial modeling logic.
A strong answer ties the instrument’s economics (bond floor + equity upside) to a conversion decision rule you can implement in a model without overcomplicating it.
What Interviewers Test in Investment Banking Technical Questions on Converts
Interviewers use this as a filter for whether you can handle investment banking technical questions that blend products, valuation, and modelling judgment. You’re expected to understand that a convertible is a hybrid: it behaves like debt until equity value makes conversion rational (subject to indenture features).
They’re also testing whether you can structure a modelling approach that’s consistent with deal reality: conversion affects the balance sheet (debt retired), the equity count (dilution), and valuation metrics (EPS, leverage, ownership). A good analyst can articulate the “decision” for conversion (what triggers it, when it happens, and whose choice it is) and reflect that in the mechanics.
Finally, they’re checking your ability to communicate trade-offs: in practice, conversion isn’t always “stock price > conversion price.” You may need to mention make-whole provisions, callability/forced conversion, net share vs physical settlement, and how you’d approximate these in an interview model versus a full convertible bond valuation framework.
Convertible Bond Valuation and Conversion Modelling Framework
- 1
Step 1: Explain the instrument (cash pay bond + embedded option)
Start with a two-part definition: a convertible bond is a corporate bond that pays coupons and returns principal, plus an option for the holder to convert into equity at a predefined conversion ratio (or equivalently a conversion price). The investor gives up some yield versus straight debt in exchange for equity participation.
Name the key terms you’ll use later in the model: face value, coupon, maturity, conversion price/ratio, conversion value (shares × stock price), and typical features like call/put dates and conversion periods. If you want one intuition line for convertible bonds explained: downside is supported by the bond’s cash flows (the “bond floor”), upside comes from equity through conversion.
Close this step by framing the modelling question: “I need to determine in which scenarios the holder converts versus remains a bondholder, and then flow that through debt, shares, and valuation outputs.”
- 2
Step 2: Set up the conversion economics and the decision rule
Define the conversion math explicitly. If par is 1,000 and conversion price is 50, then conversion ratio is 1,000 / 50 = 20 shares. At any time, the conversion value is stock price × conversion ratio.
Then state the decision rule you’ll implement in an interview model: convert when the value received upon conversion exceeds the value of staying in the bond (or exceeds the cash/settlement amount the holder would otherwise receive). As a simple approximation at maturity with no path-dependence, it’s:
- Convert if (Stock price at conversion date × conversion ratio) > redemption amount (usually par)
If you want to level it up for convertible bond valuation: the “stay in bond” value is the PV of remaining coupons plus principal, adjusted for credit risk and any put/call features; but for many interview cases, a clean threshold approach is acceptable as long as you say what you’re simplifying.
- 3
Step 3: Model mechanics on the financial statements (debt retirement + dilution)
Explain how you reflect conversion in outputs. On conversion, the bond liability is extinguished (debt goes down), and equity increases (paid-in capital/retained earnings depending on accounting). In an IB interview model you usually capture this in a simplified way: debt balance reduced by the converted principal; share count increases by the shares issued (or by net shares if net share settlement).
Be explicit about settlement type because it changes dilution:
- Physical settlement: issue conversion ratio shares; principal is effectively “paid” in stock.
- Net share settlement: issuer pays principal in cash and issues only the in-the-money portion in shares (reduces dilution).
For modeling convertible bonds in LBO/M&A or EPS/valuation contexts, highlight the outputs: basic vs diluted shares, interest expense savings post-conversion (after tax), and the impact on leverage ratios. The interviewer is looking for consistency: if you add shares, you should also remove interest expense (and debt) from the period after conversion.
- 4
Step 4: Implement a practical conversion schedule and sanity checks
Describe how you would implement it in Excel under interview time constraints. A common approach is scenario-based: project stock price (or use terminal equity value) and test conversion at the first eligible date or at maturity. In many deal models you assume conversion at maturity unless the security is callable and deeply in the money (forced conversion risk).
Mechanically:
- Calculate conversion ratio.
- Compute conversion value each period (or at maturity).
- Apply an IF statement to determine “convert” vs “redeem.”
- If convert: reduce debt, add shares, remove interest from that point.
Then give 2–3 sanity checks: conversion should only happen when equity value is sufficiently high; share count should jump only when you assume conversion; interest expense should fall when debt is removed; and the implied diluted shares should reconcile to a treasury stock method-style intuition when the settlement is net share. This is the interview-friendly, step-by-step guide to convertible bond modeling without building a full option-pricing engine.
Analyst-Level Answer for Convertible Bonds Interview Prep
Convertible bonds are hybrid securities: they pay fixed coupons like a bond, but they also give the holder the right to convert into equity at a preset conversion ratio. In modelling terms, I treat them as debt unless and until conversion is economically better for the holder.
Mechanically, I start with the key terms: par, coupon, maturity, and the conversion price. From the conversion price I compute the conversion ratio, i.e., par divided by conversion price, and then the conversion value at a given share price is stock price times that ratio.
To model conversion, I set a decision rule at the conversion date I’m using in the model—often maturity in a simplified interview setup. If conversion value exceeds the amount the holder would receive by staying in the bond, I assume conversion; otherwise it stays as debt and is redeemed at par. If I want to be more precise, the ‘stay as a bond’ value is the PV of remaining coupons and principal adjusted for credit, but in most IB models I’ll state that I’m approximating with the redemption amount unless features like puts or calls are central.
Once conversion happens, I reflect it in the statements: the debt balance is reduced by the converted principal, interest expense stops from that point, and the share count increases by the shares issued. I also call out settlement—physical settlement issues the full conversion shares, while net share settlement pays principal in cash and only issues shares for the in-the-money portion, which lowers dilution. Finally, I sanity-check that dilution and interest savings move in opposite directions and that conversion only triggers when equity value is high enough.
- Lead with the hybrid intuition (bond floor + equity option) before the mechanics.
- State the conversion rule and explicitly name the simplifying assumption (maturity test vs PV-of-cash-flows).
- Always link conversion to modelling outputs: debt down, interest down, shares up; mention settlement type.
- If pressed, acknowledge calls/forced conversion and path-dependence as extensions.
Common Errors in Modeling Convertible Bonds Under Pressure
- Defining conversion only as “stock price > conversion price” without comparing to the bond’s remaining value or redemption amount.
- Ignoring settlement terms (physical vs net share) and therefore overstating or misstating dilution.
- Adding diluted shares but forgetting to remove the associated interest expense (and tax effect) post-conversion.
- Treating conversion as immediate without checking when conversion is allowed and whether calls/puts can change timing.
- Overbuilding an option-pricing model in an interview instead of giving a clear, auditable approach first.
- Failing to articulate what is holder choice versus issuer action (e.g., callability can pressure conversion).
Follow-Ups: Conversion Features, Dilution, and Deal Modelling
How is a convertible different from a warrant or a straight bond with warrants attached?
A convertible is one instrument where the bond can be exchanged for shares; a bond-with-warrants keeps the bond outstanding and adds detachable equity upside via warrants, so credit exposure and dilution mechanics differ.
What’s the “bond floor” and how does it matter for valuation?
The bond floor is the value of the convertible as straight debt (PV of coupons and principal at an appropriate credit spread); it anchors downside and explains why converts can trade above distressed equity levels.
How would you handle net share settlement in a diluted share count?
Assume cash is used to repay principal and only the in-the-money value is issued as shares, so incremental shares are (conversion value − principal) / stock price, not the full conversion ratio.
When can an issuer force conversion?
If the bond is callable and the stock trades above a trigger for a set period, the issuer can call the bond, which often induces holders to convert rather than take the call price.
In an M&A model, do you assume converts convert or get cashed out?
It depends on deal terms and moneyness; I’d test both: cash-out increases uses (debt-like), while conversion increases pro forma shares and reduces interest, affecting accretion/dilution.
Practice Plan Using Investment Banking Interview Techniques
- Deliver a 3-minute version that hits: definition → conversion ratio/value → decision rule → debt/shares/interest mechanics; this is the core of investment banking interview techniques for advanced product questions.
- Build a tiny template once: inputs (par, coupon, conversion price, tax rate, settlement), outputs (debt, interest, diluted shares). Rehearse explaining each line in plain English.
- Practice one numeric example (e.g., par 1,000; conversion price 50; stock 40 vs 70) and be ready to sanity-check outcomes quickly.
- Use AceTheRound to simulate follow-ups where the interviewer changes one feature (callable, net share settlement, make-whole) and you adapt your modelling approach without losing structure.
Ready to practice with AceTheRound?
Create an account to unlock AI mock interviews, feedback, and the full prep library.